Talk:Tropical Storm Nangka (2020)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 13 October 2020 by reviewer Nathan2055 (talk · contribs).

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2020 Pacific typhoon season was copied or moved into Tropical Storm Nangka (2020) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled

Bypass Afc and move straight to article space? Anyone agree? Elijahandskip (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge this?

Speedy keep, and Destroyeraa rm'd the merge tag. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 13:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

It would be much more productive to just merge this to the 2020 Central Vietnam floods article because its very bare and only a sections worth of info on impacts is actually included here and the meteorological history section is barely a paragraph. Nor is there any other important info included about this storm that can not just included in the 2020 Central Vietnam floods article, like Linfa. Hurricaneboy23 (page) * (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we should merge these 2 together because 4 deaths caused by Nangka are not related to the floods. Vinhson27 (talk) 05:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. Two people were killed in China. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 12:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep China impacts and Vietnam impact are not very related. SMB9 9thx my edits 12:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Can't deny its impacts on China and Hong Kong. If there's any effect on Vietnam that was directly or indirectly (but still caused by) Nangka, just keep it as a short summary and save the rest for the 2020 Central Vietnam floods. Chlod (say hi!) 13:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Except the fact that the impacts section for China and Hongkong is literally 3 sentences worth of info, so it clearly wasn't that bad. Linfa did more damage and had its article merged. Plus, if we don't merge that info into 2020 Central Vietnam Floods, it can most definitely fit in the season article. Hurricaneboy23 (page) * (talk) 14:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you're gauging a storm's impact by the amount of sentences the article has, Sinlaku has nearly the same amount of recognition outside of Vietnam, and a similar total death count, give or take two people. Nangka also got some recognition in the press so it's definitely notable (though perhaps more content could be added to it, such as the content of this SCMP article). If it ever comes to it, I'm open to merging it with the season article, however merging it with just the floods article generalizes too much. Chlod (say hi!) 14:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.